Current Issue

by Jim Lyons | 5/1/14

Some recent visions of our industry have seen printers, scanners and MFPs as powerful central hubs in a cloud-based future. But what of a somewhat more humble but potentially more pervasive role? Lately, I have been asking, even advocating, a position more along the lines of "printers as things," as in part of the "Internet of things" (IOT).

Some recent visions of our industry have seen printers, scanners and MFPs as powerful central hubs in a cloud-based future. But what of a somewhat more humble but potentially more pervasive role? Lately, I have been asking, even advocating, a position more along the lines of "printers as things," as in part of the "Internet of things" (IOT).

A consultation with Wikipedia, the ultimate source, or at least the ultimate starting point, especially for all things technoid in nature, led me to its "Internet of things" article. The entry starts off with description of "IOT" as referring "to uniquely identifiable objects and their virtual representations in an Internet-like structure". While that's a little general, later in the article, in a brief discussion, it really starts to sound like something that can and does apply to printers. The article touches on "predictive interaction," describing "where cloud or fog-based decision makers will predict the user's next action and trigger some reaction." I think one only has to look as far as HP's Instant Ink program offering to see the connection.

I have been intrigued with the development of HP's Instant Ink for some time now, partly because it seemed to represent the manifestation of a vision going back 20 years, at a time during the middle of my 25-year HP career. A team I led in 1994 had the great opportunity to be among the first to think about the then-nascent Internet and what impact it would have on printers and printing.

We foresaw things changing on a grander scale, like the societal shift in information dissemination, from centralized printing followed by distribution ("print and distribute") to electronic distribution with optional printing at the point of consumption ("distribute and print"). But we also predicted (“fancied” might be a better word) that there would come a time when a printer (LaserJet in our case) could detect an impending need for additional toner and "order" its own replacement cartridge in a timely manner.

It took 20 years for this vision to be realized via Instant Ink, where consumers' printing habits are tracked and their ink needs fulfilled via timely replacement ink shipments via the mail. And while the program deserves a full "Observations" to do its many moving parts justice (stay tuned), its role as an example of printers as things should be clear.

For an outside view, I sought out an expert who might give some further perspective on this premise. Steve Hoffenberg is currently Director, Machine-to-Machine Embedded Software and Tools at VDC Research in the Boston area. Before that, he and I were colleagues at Lyra Research for a bit, and before that, while I was still with HP, I knew him as Lyra's expert on digital imaging, who reported on the advent and eventual explosion of digital photography, and analyzed its huge (and varying) impact on printing.

In emails and phone conversations, Steve and I explored this "printers as things" idea, and he surprised me by even taking it a step further, suggesting Managed Print Services (MPS) as an early proof point for further IOT development. Just as its "supplies management" component has been used as a comparison point for some who have referred to Instant Ink as "MPS for the home," its other interactions via the network can be seen as groundbreaking in terms of network-based management and control.

In Steve's words, "Managed Print Services were early implementations of the 'Internet of Things,' without the parties involved referring to it by that phrase. The printer industry was one of the leaders in a technology revolution of connected devices, but it was flying under the radar of the Internet cognoscenti."

That's pretty good validation for my "things" thinking - even if some in the printing and imaging world see it as a demotion of sorts!

Jim Lyons has been writing, analyzing and blogging about industry developments since 2006. In his monthly Observations column he comments on business and marketing developments in the printing and imaging industry, combining many years of experience with an ever-enthusiastic eye on the future. In the Jim Lyons Observations column on The Imaging Channel, highlights from that blog appear monthly. Lyons is also a faculty member at the University of Phoenix, teaching marketing and economics at its school of business, and is a regular contributor to both The Imaging Channel and Workflow. Follow him on Twitter @jflyons and read more of Jim Lyons Observations at http://www.jimlyonsobservations.com/.